Details

    • Type: Question
    • Status: Open
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      AsyncChan is a bit of an aberration. You can use it just like AsyncSTM, but once you've obtained the result, it's not longer useful, because subsequent reads will block.

      I think we should either think of a useful API for this - e.g,. a handle that can be used to refer to the results of multiple asynchronous tasks via a compositional API - or get rid of it altogether.

      I'm open to suggestions here. If we do remove it, we can get rid of the abstraction layer in Async and pull AsyncSTM up.

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              hyperthunk hyperthunk
              Reporter:
              hyperthunk hyperthunk
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated: